View In:   ArcGIS JavaScript   ArcGIS Online Map Viewer   ArcGIS Earth   ArcGIS Pro

Service Description: This 90m raster was developed to represent combined Insect Hazard, and Root Disease Hazard for the OutYear Planning Pod Assessments. This raster was developed based on the 2019 OutYear Planning Workshop and discussions with Joel Egan R1-FHP. The North Idaho and Western Montana Pods decided to use a combined Insect and Root Disease Hazard layer for Vegetation Resistance. The Eastern Montana Pod decided to only use an Insect Hazard layer for Vegetation Resistance. The Dakota Prairie Grasslands Insect Hazard layer is for Green Ash Borer was created separately from the rest of the Eastern Montana Pod area. A Geospatial Processing Toolbox ?OYP Veg Resistence Toolbox.tbx? was created for all of the analysis except the VMap Disturbance Update which used a Toolbox in the Reference GeoTool r01 Toolbox Library.Raster Values for Insect and Disease Hazard: 0 None33 Low (DF Beetle mod)67 Mod (Combine Pine MPB, Sprubce Beetle, Ponderosa Pine SDI Beetle, Grand Fir Engraver mod)100 High.(any insect or root disease high) For Northern Idaho and Western Montana Pods Insect Hazard and Root Disease Hazard were modeled separately. Each VMap polygon was assigned an Insect Hazard score and a Root Disease source with upto four values 0 None, 33 Low, 67 Mod, and 100 High. Then a combined Insect Hazard and Root Disease score was calculated based on the highest hazard from either Insect or Root Disease scores.The Northern Idaho and Western Montana Pod Insect Hazard Score based on five separate insect hazard attributes queried from VMap data. The five insect hazard ratings are: Douglas-fir Beetle, Combined Pine Mountain Pine Beetle, Spruce Beetle, Ponderosa Pine SDI Beetle, and Grand Fir Engraver. The first four insect hazard ratings are based on R1 FHP Conservative and Limited Categorical VMap attribute queries. The Grand Fir Engraver hazard is based on a VMap attribute query. For each VMap polygon the overall insect hazard score was calculated based on the highest hazard. Each of the insect hazard rulesets are shown below.The Northern Idaho and Western Montana Pod Root Disease Severity was modeled by R1 FHP into a 30m raster layer. The mean root disease severity value for a VMap polygon was calculated from the raster layer. Susceptible stands with 40% or more presence of Douglas-fir, Grand Fir or Subalpine Fir were selected and then a Root Disease Hazard value determined based on:if DOM_MID_40 NOT IN (8025, 8035, 8065) or DOM_MID_40 IN (8025, 8035, 8065) and RD_SEVERITY = 0 then 0elseif DOM_MID_40 IN (8025, 8035, 8065) and RD_SEVERITY > 0 and RD_SEVERITY <= 1 then 33elseif DOM_MID_40 IN (8025, 8035, 8065) and RD_SEVERITY > 1 and RD_SEVERITY <= 2 then 67elseif DOM_MID_40 IN (8025, 8035, 8065) and RD_SEVERITY > 2 then 100Douglas-Fir Beetle Conservative and Limited Ruleset using Categorical VMap attributes:# DFB CONS-LIM HIGHDOM_MID_40 = MX-PSME AND TREESIZE 15+?# DFB CONS-LIM MODDOM_MID_40 = MX-PSME AND TREESIZE 10-14?# DFB CONS-LIM LOWDOM_MID_40 = MX-PSME AND TREESIZE 0-9?Combined Pine Mountain Pine Beetle Conservative and Limited Ruleset using Categorical VMap attributes:# COMB MPB CONS-LIM HIGHDOM_MID_40 IN (MX-PIPO, MX-PICO, MX-PIAL, MX-PIFL) AND TREESIZE 10+? AND TREECANOPY >= 25%# COMB MPB CONS-LIM MODDOM_MID_40 IN (MX-PIPO, MX-PICO, MX-PIAL, MX-PIFL) AND TREESIZE 5-9? AND TREECANOPY >= 25% # COMB MPB CONS-LIM MODDOM_MID_40 IN (MX-PIPO, MX-PICO, MX-PIAL, MX-PIFL) AND TREESIZE 0-4? AND TREECANOPY >= 40%# COMB MPB CONS-LIM LOWDOM_MID_40 IN (MX-PIPO, MX-PICO, MX-PIAL, MX-PIFL) AND TREESIZE 5+? AND TREECANOPY 10-24% # COMB MPB CONS-LIM LOWDOM_MID_40 IN

Map Name: R1_OYP_FAI_Relative__Vegetation_Hazard__2020

Legend

All Layers and Tables

Dynamic Legend

Dynamic All Layers

Layers:

• Relative Vegetation Hazard Class (0)

Description: This 90m raster was developed to represent combined Insect Hazard, and Root Disease Hazard for the OutYear Planning Pod Assessments. This raster was developed based on the 2019 OutYear Planning Workshop and discussions with Joel Egan R1-FHP. The North Idaho and Western Montana Pods decided to use a combined Insect and Root Disease Hazard layer for Vegetation Resistance. The Eastern Montana Pod decided to only use an Insect Hazard layer for Vegetation Resistance. The Dakota Prairie Grasslands Insect Hazard layer is for Green Ash Borer was created separately from the rest of the Eastern Montana Pod area. A Geospatial Processing Toolbox ?OYP Veg Resistence Toolbox.tbx? was created for all of the analysis except the VMap Disturbance Update which used a Toolbox in the Reference GeoTool r01 Toolbox Library.Raster Values for Insect and Disease Hazard: 0 None33 Low (DF Beetle mod)67 Mod (Combine Pine MPB, Sprubce Beetle, Ponderosa Pine SDI Beetle, Grand Fir Engraver mod)100 High.(any insect or root disease high) For Northern Idaho and Western Montana Pods Insect Hazard and Root Disease Hazard were modeled separately. Each VMap polygon was assigned an Insect Hazard score and a Root Disease source with upto four values 0 None, 33 Low, 67 Mod, and 100 High. Then a combined Insect Hazard and Root Disease score was calculated based on the highest hazard from either Insect or Root Disease scores.The Northern Idaho and Western Montana Pod Insect Hazard Score based on five separate insect hazard attributes queried from VMap data. The five insect hazard ratings are: Douglas-fir Beetle, Combined Pine Mountain Pine Beetle, Spruce Beetle, Ponderosa Pine SDI Beetle, and Grand Fir Engraver. The first four insect hazard ratings are based on R1 FHP Conservative and Limited Categorical VMap attribute queries. The Grand Fir Engraver hazard is based on a VMap attribute query. For each VMap polygon the overall insect hazard score was calculated based on the highest hazard. Each of the insect hazard rulesets are shown below.The Northern Idaho and Western Montana Pod Root Disease Severity was modeled by R1 FHP into a 30m raster layer. The mean root disease severity value for a VMap polygon was calculated from the raster layer. Susceptible stands with 40% or more presence of Douglas-fir, Grand Fir or Subalpine Fir were selected and then a Root Disease Hazard value determined based on:if DOM_MID_40 NOT IN (8025, 8035, 8065) or DOM_MID_40 IN (8025, 8035, 8065) and RD_SEVERITY = 0 then 0elseif DOM_MID_40 IN (8025, 8035, 8065) and RD_SEVERITY > 0 and RD_SEVERITY <= 1 then 33elseif DOM_MID_40 IN (8025, 8035, 8065) and RD_SEVERITY > 1 and RD_SEVERITY <= 2 then 67elseif DOM_MID_40 IN (8025, 8035, 8065) and RD_SEVERITY > 2 then 100Douglas-Fir Beetle Conservative and Limited Ruleset using Categorical VMap attributes:# DFB CONS-LIM HIGHDOM_MID_40 = MX-PSME AND TREESIZE 15+?# DFB CONS-LIM MODDOM_MID_40 = MX-PSME AND TREESIZE 10-14?# DFB CONS-LIM LOWDOM_MID_40 = MX-PSME AND TREESIZE 0-9?Combined Pine Mountain Pine Beetle Conservative and Limited Ruleset using Categorical VMap attributes:# COMB MPB CONS-LIM HIGHDOM_MID_40 IN (MX-PIPO, MX-PICO, MX-PIAL, MX-PIFL) AND TREESIZE 10+? AND TREECANOPY >= 25%# COMB MPB CONS-LIM MODDOM_MID_40 IN (MX-PIPO, MX-PICO, MX-PIAL, MX-PIFL) AND TREESIZE 5-9? AND TREECANOPY >= 25% # COMB MPB CONS-LIM MODDOM_MID_40 IN (MX-PIPO, MX-PICO, MX-PIAL, MX-PIFL) AND TREESIZE 0-4? AND TREECANOPY >= 40%# COMB MPB CONS-LIM LOWDOM_MID_40 IN (MX-PIPO, MX-PICO, MX-PIAL, MX-PIFL) AND TREESIZE 5+? AND TREECANOPY 10-24% # COMB MPB CONS-LIM LOWDOM_MID_40 IN

Copyright Text: The USDA Forest Service makes no warranty, expressed or implied, including the warranties of merchantability and fitness for a particular purpose, nor assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, reliability, completeness or utility of these geospatial data, or for the improper or incorrect use of these geospatial data. These geospatial data and related maps or graphics are not legal documents and are not intended to be used as such. The data and maps may not be used to determine title, ownership, legal descriptions or boundaries, legal jurisdiction, or restrictions that may be in place on either public or private land. Natural hazards may or may not be depicted on the data and maps, and land users should exercise due caution. The data are dynamic and may change over time. The user is responsible to verify the limitations of the geospatial data and to use the data accordingly.

Spatial Reference: PROJCS["NAD_1983_Albers",GEOGCS["GCS_North_American_1983",DATUM["D_North_American_1983",SPHEROID["GRS_1980",6378137.0,298.257222101]],PRIMEM["Greenwich",0.0],UNIT["Degree",0.0174532925199433]],PROJECTION["Albers"],PARAMETER["False_Easting",600000.0],PARAMETER["False_Northing",0.0],PARAMETER["central_meridian",-109.5],PARAMETER["Standard_Parallel_1",46.0],PARAMETER["Standard_Parallel_2",48.0],PARAMETER["latitude_of_origin",44.0],UNIT["Meter",1.0]]


Single Fused Map Cache: false

Initial Extent:

XMin: -31258.500000000116
YMin: 88642.95543175482
XMax: 1174858.5
YMax: 879282.3259052926
Spatial Reference: PROJCS["NAD_1983_Albers",GEOGCS["GCS_North_American_1983",DATUM["D_North_American_1983",SPHEROID["GRS_1980",6378137.0,298.257222101]],PRIMEM["Greenwich",0.0],UNIT["Degree",0.0174532925199433]],PROJECTION["Albers"],PARAMETER["False_Easting",600000.0],PARAMETER["False_Northing",0.0],PARAMETER["central_meridian",-109.5],PARAMETER["Standard_Parallel_1",46.0],PARAMETER["Standard_Parallel_2",48.0],PARAMETER["latitude_of_origin",44.0],UNIT["Meter",1.0]]

Full Extent:

XMin: -31258.49999999989
YMin: 108291.25677966097
XMax: 1174858.5
YMax: 829917.190677966
Spatial Reference: PROJCS["NAD_1983_Albers",GEOGCS["GCS_North_American_1983",DATUM["D_North_American_1983",SPHEROID["GRS_1980",6378137.0,298.257222101]],PRIMEM["Greenwich",0.0],UNIT["Degree",0.0174532925199433]],PROJECTION["Albers"],PARAMETER["False_Easting",600000.0],PARAMETER["False_Northing",0.0],PARAMETER["central_meridian",-109.5],PARAMETER["Standard_Parallel_1",46.0],PARAMETER["Standard_Parallel_2",48.0],PARAMETER["latitude_of_origin",44.0],UNIT["Meter",1.0]]

Units: esriMeters

Supported Image Format Types: PNG32,PNG24,PNG,JPG,DIB,TIFF,EMF,PS,PDF,GIF,SVG,SVGZ,BMP

Document Info:

Title: Untitled.aprx
Author:
Comments: This layer identifies areas at risk of fire to communities and infrastructure. Several data layers are used to define these areas. First, Fire Risk Extent is created to identify the areas that are near communities and valuable infrastructure. The Fire Risk Extent is defined by the following layers: WUI, NoRRA Fire Risk Infrastructure, Municipal Watersheds, and corporate timber lands. Wildland fire hazard potential and population density provides the values within the fire risk extent.The Wildfire Hazard Potential and Where People Live Population Density layers are integrated using map algebra sum function. A focal sum was run to rescale the data from 0 to 100 to create the final Fire Risk FAI.*Update - This layer was created by merging together the Fire Risk layers from each Pod (Northern Idaho, Western Montana, and East) to create one Regional Fire Risk Layer.
Subject: Abundance of Fire Risk Class Mosaic
Category:
Keywords: R01,OYP
AntialiasingMode: None
TextAntialiasingMode: Force

Supports Dynamic Layers: true

MaxRecordCount: 2000

MaxImageHeight: 4096

MaxImageWidth: 4096

Supported Query Formats: JSON, geoJSON, PBF

Supports Query Data Elements: true

Min Scale: 10000000

Max Scale: 0

Supports Datum Transformation: true



Child Resources:   Info   Dynamic Layer

Supported Operations:   Export Map   Identify   QueryLegends   QueryDomains   Find   Return Updates