ItemInfo

Item Information

snippet:	These data were collected for a variety of project-specific purposes that included: species status assessments, trend monitoring at one or many sites, development of predictive species distribution models, detection and tracking of nonnative species invasions, and assessments of habitat restoration efforts. These data may have been downloaded from selected points in ArcGIS Online and may not represent the entire geodatabase. Updated May 2024. See the USDA Research Data Archive website for more specifics and full updated metadata: https://www.fs.usda.gov/rds/archive/products/RDS-2018-0010/_metadata_RDS-2018-0010.html
summary:	These data were collected for a variety of project-specific purposes that included: species status assessments, trend monitoring at one or many sites, development of predictive species distribution models, detection and tracking of nonnative species invasions, and assessments of habitat restoration efforts. These data may have been downloaded from selected points in ArcGIS Online and may not represent the entire geodatabase. Updated May 2024. See the USDA Research Data Archive website for more specifics and full updated metadata: https://www.fs.usda.gov/rds/archive/products/RDS-2018-0010/_metadata_RDS-2018-0010.html
accessInformation:	Funding for this project was provided by the National Fish and Wildlife Foundation’s Bring Back the Natives program (grants #54500 and #58636; https://www.nfwf.org); USDA Forest Service Rocky Mountain Research Station Water and Watersheds Program (https://www.fs.usda.gov/research/rmrs/programs/waterwatersheds); and the USDA Forest Service, National Genomics Center for Wildlife and Fish Conservation (https://www.fs.usda.gov/research/rmrs/projects/ngc). We would also like to credit Jennifer Hernandez for the significant amount of work she has put into developing this database.
thumbnail:
maxScale:	5000
typeKeywords:	[]
description:	<DIV STYLE="text-align:Left;"><DIV><DIV><P><SPAN>The eDNA samples in the eDNAtlas database describe species occurrence locations and were collected by the U.S. Forest Service and numerous agencies that have partnered with the National Genomics Center for Wildlife and Fish Conservation (NGC) throughout the United States. </SPAN></P><P><SPAN>This project began in 2015, but updates will include legacy data that were collected using the same protocol. The eDNAtlas database consists of five feature classes. </SPAN></P><P><SPAN STYLE="font-weight:bold;">This is the first component (eDNAtlas_East_AGOL_SampleGridAndResults)</SPAN><SPAN> and is a systematically-spaced 1-kilometer grid of potential sample points in streams and rivers throughout the eastern United States. The points in the sampling grid are arrayed along the medium-resolution National Hydrography Dataset Version 2 (NHDPlusV2) and can be used to develop custom eDNA sampling strategies for many purposes. Each sample point has a unique identity code that enables efficient integration of processed eDNA sample results with the species occurrence database. </SPAN></P><P><SPAN>The second component (eDNAtlas_NHDPlusV2_AGOL_ResultsOnly) is a database of georeferenced species occurrence locations based on eDNA field sampling results, which are downloadable by species through dynamic ArcGIS Online (AGOL) mapping tools. The points coincide with the sampling grid and are along the medium-resolution National Hydrography Dataset Version 2 (NHDPlusV2). The earliest eDNA results in the database were collected in 2015 but new samples and results are added annually to the database, which houses thousands of species occurrence records. This feature class includes results from both the western United States and the eastern portion of the country. </SPAN></P><P><SPAN>The third component (eDNAtlas_NHDPlusHR_AGOL_ResultsOnly) is a point feature class of all eDNAtlas sample locations that are NOT associated with the eDNAtlas NHDPlusV2 1 km sample grid. These features represent sample locations in smalls streams, lakes, wetlands, springs, and other features that are not represented in the NHDPlusV2 digital data. Many of the sample locations have corresponding features in the NHDPlus High Resolution (NHDPlusHR) dataset. When possible, these sample points are attributed with selected NHDPlusHR attributes. Where no NHDPlusHR feature was present but a valid water sample was collected, field points are represented in this feature class, however no NHDPlus attributes are assigned to the attribute table. </SPAN></P><P><SPAN>The fourth component (eDNAtlas_West_AGOL_SampleGridAndResults) is a systematically-spaced 1-kilometer grid of potential sample points in streams and rivers throughout the western United States. The points in the sampling grid are arrayed along the medium-resolution National Hydrography Dataset Version 2 (NHDPlusV2) and can be used to develop custom eDNA sampling strategies for many purposes. Each sample point has a unique identity code that enables efficient integration of processed eDNA sample results with the species occurrence database. </SPAN></P><P><SPAN>The fifth component (eDNAtlas_Plains_AGOL_SampleGridAndResults) is a systematically-spaced 1-kilometer grid of potential sample points in streams and rivers throughout the middle “plains” region of the United States. Together with the eDNAtlas_East_AGOL_SampleGridAndResults and the eDNAtlas_West_AGOL_SampleGridAndResults, sample grid and results points are available for the continental United States. The points in the sampling grid are arrayed along the medium-resolution National Hydrography Dataset Version 2 (NHDPlusV2) and can be used to develop custom eDNA sampling strategies for many purposes. Each sample point has a unique identity code that enables efficient integration of processed eDNA sample results with the species occurrence database. </SPAN></P><P><SPAN>In the feature class attribute tables, the unique ID for each grid sample point is eDNA_ID. The unique ID for each National Genomics Center for Wildlife and Fish Conservation (NGC) lab result is ID_Tag. There can be more than one ID_Tag per eDNA_ID grid sample point. </SPAN></P><P><SPAN>For more information, see the website - https://www.fs.usda.gov/research/rmrs/projects/ednatlas</SPAN></P></DIV></DIV></DIV>
licenseInfo:	<DIV STYLE="text-align:Left;"><DIV><DIV><P><SPAN>These species occurrence data and accompanying geospatial datasets were created using funding from the U.S. Government and can be used without additional permissions or fees. If you use these data in a publication, presentation, or other research product please use the following citation: </SPAN></P><P><SPAN>Young, Michael K.; Isaak, Daniel J.; Schwartz, Michael K.; McKelvey, Kevin S.; Nagel, David E.; Franklin, Thomas W.; Greaves, Samuel E.; Dysthe, J. Caleb; Pilgrim, Kristine L.; Chandler, Gwynne L.; Wollrab, Sherry P.; Carim, Kellie J.; Wilcox, Taylor M.; Parkes-Payne, Sharon L.; Horan, Dona L. 2018. Species occurrence data from the aquatic eDNAtlas database. Fort Collins, CO: Forest Service Research Data Archive. Updated 17 May 2024. https://doi.org/10.2737/RDS-2018-0010 </SPAN></P><P><SPAN>The USDA Forest Service makes no warranty, expressed or implied, including the warranties of merchantability and fitness for a particular purpose, nor assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, reliability, completeness or utility of these geospatial data, or for the improper or incorrect use of these geospatial data. These geospatial data and related maps or graphics are not legal documents and are not intended to be used as such. The data and maps may not be used to determine title, ownership, legal descriptions or boundaries, legal jurisdiction, or restrictions that may be in place on either public or private land. Natural hazards may or may not be depicted on the data and maps, and land users should exercise due caution. The data are dynamic and may change over time. The user is responsible to verify the limitations of the geospatial data and to use the data accordingly. </SPAN></P><P><SPAN>We would also like to credit Jennifer Hernandez for the significant amount of work she has put into developing this database.</SPAN></P></DIV></DIV></DIV>
catalogPath:
title:	Species occurrence data from the aquatic eDNAtlas database
type:
url:
tags:	["American bullfrog","Asian clam","American Dipper","American eel","Northwestern salamander","American marten","Yellow bullhead","California floater","Oregon floater","Arctic grayling","Atlantic salmon","American water shrew","Any cutthroat trout","Bobcat","Chytrid fungus","American beaver","Black carp","Blue tilapia","Boreal Toad","Big-eared radix","Brook Trout","Brown Trout","Bull Trout","Burbot","Snake River bluehead sucker","Channel catfish","Coastal Cutthroat Trout","Cedar Sculpin","Snakehead","Chinook Salmon","Chinese mystery snail","Chihuahua chub","Chum Salmon","Common Carp","Canyon Treefrog","Coho Salmon","Columbia spotted frog","Coastal Tailed Frog","Crucian carp","Bluehead sucker","Blue Sucker","Desert pupfish","Coyote","Eastern indigo snake","Dolly Varden","Dreissenid mussels","Desert sucker","Eastern Hellbender","Brazilian elodia","Candy Darter","Flathead Catfish","Flannelmouth Sucker","Fisher","Humpback Chub","Goldfish/Prussian carp","Golden mussel","Grass carp","Grizzly/Brown Bear","Green sunfish","Gila topminnow","Gray redhorse","Harlequin Duck","Hydrilla","Idaho Giant Salamander","Jaguar","Klamath marbled sculpin","Lake Trout","Lampetra spp.","Lahontan Cutthroat","Wood Frog","Long-toed salamander","Loach Minnow","Lynx","Muskrat","Marbled crayfish","Mosquitofish","Mountain sucker","Northern Mexican gartersnake","Opposum Shrimp","Mozambique tilapia","Narrow headed garter snake","Northern Leopard Frog","Nile Tilapia","Northern Leatherside","Northern Pike","Northern red-legged frog","Nutria","New Zealand Mud Snail","Olympic mudminnow","Oriental weatherloach","Pacific Lamprey","Pacific Chorus Frog","Eurasian minnow","Coeur d'Alene salamander","Northern Plains killifish","Plains topminnow","Pacific Marten","Pink Salmon","White-nose syndrome","Mountain lion","Snake River Physa","Quagga mussel","Foothill yellow-legged frog","Lowland leopardfrog","Red spruce","Redswamp crayfish","Red shiner","Round goby","Rio Grande Chub","Rio Grande sucker","Rough-skinned newt","Southern torrent salamander","Rocky Mountain Sculpin","Rocky Mountain Tailed Frog","Ranavirus","Rainbow Trout/Steelhead","Ringed crayfish","Rusty Crayfish","Roundtail chub","North American river otter","Razorback sucker","Sacramento sucker","Sauger","Salish Sucker","Sacramento pikeminnow","Siberian sturgeon","Any Sculpin","Sirajo","Sea lamprey","Any Salmonid","Slimy Sculpin","Smallmouth Bass","Snapping Turtle","Snow Leopard","Sonora sucker","Sockeye Salmon","Southern leatherside chub","Western spadefoot toad","Spikedace","Sturgeon Chub","Sonoran tiger salamander","Silver/Bighead carp","Swine","Taimen","Torrent Sculpin","Texas hornshell","Umpqua Pikeminnow","Umpqua Chub","Umpqua Dace","Varroa mite","Virile Crayfish","Red fox","Walleye","Western Pearshell","Southwestern willow flycatcher","Wami tilapia","Western Pond Turtle","Western ridged mussel","Westslope Cutthroat Trout","western spadefoot toad","Wolverine","Wyoming pocket gopher","Yaqui catfish","Yellowstone Cutthroat Trout","Zebra Mussel","Zuni bluehead sucker","biota","inlandWaters","climatologyMeteorologyAtmosphere","environment","Natural Resource Management & Use","Landscape management","Forest & Plant Health","Climate effects","Invasive species","Wildlife (or Fauna)","Fish","Habitat management","Ecology","Ecosystems","& Environment","Climate change","Hydrology","watersheds","sedimentation","Inventory","Monitoring","& Analysis","Monitoring","status","study","eDNA","assay","fish","survey","occurrence","location","population","sample","aquatic","habitat","presence","absence","environmental DNA","eastern United States","western United States"]
culture:	en-US
name:
guid:
minScale:	150000000
spatialReference: